Becoming a Candidate

Expand All

Becoming a Candidate

Becoming a competitive National Fellowship Candidate takes time, dedication, focus and ability. Some National Fellowships require Texas A&M to convene a selection committee and choose only a few students to receive an official nomination. It is highly unlikely that you will be able to walk in the door to the Office of National Fellowships for the first time and have an application that is competitive, especially for those National Fellowships that require Texas A&M to endorse you. Tips for becoming a competitive candidate include:

Start Early

Students should anticipate dedicating approximately six months to preparing a competitive application, provided they have already developed the experiences, qualifications and skills aligned with the fellowship’s selection criteria. Students are encouraged to contact the National Fellowships advisor as soon as they identify an award of interest in order to establish a preparation timeline and receive guidance throughout the application process. (natlfellows@tamu.edu)

Know the Requirements

Many national fellowships include specific eligibility requirements, which may be based on factors such as grade point ratio (GPR), citizenship, field of study or classification. Students are responsible for reviewing and confirming their eligibility prior to applying. Those who have questions regarding eligibility criteria are encouraged to consult with the National Fellowships advisor for clarification and guidance.

Develop a Competitive Profile

Students who aspire to become competitive candidates for national fellowships should intentionally cultivate a strong academic record, sustained leadership and meaningful engagement beyond the classroom. This preparation may include pursuing advanced coursework, studying another language, engaging in research or creative projects on campus and at other institutions, and seeking faculty mentorship early in their academic careers. Students are also encouraged to apply for competitive university opportunities, such as the Gathright/Deans’ Excellence Awards, which recognize achievement and provide valuable experience in preparing competitive applications. Thoughtful, sustained involvement in these activities strengthens a student’s profile and readiness for national competition.

Do Your Research

A national fellowship that is widely recognized as prestigious or offers a substantial monetary award may not necessarily represent the best fit for every student. Applicants should carefully research each fellowship to understand the qualities and experiences sought in candidates, as well as the mission and objectives of the awarding organization. A strong alignment between a student’s goals, experiences and the fellowship’s purpose is essential to developing a competitive application.

Integrity in the Application Process

Applicants are expected to present their qualifications, accomplishments and experiences with accuracy and integrity. Any form of exaggeration, misrepresentation or omission of material information undermines the integrity of the application process and may result in disqualification. Students should ensure that all materials submitted reflect an honest and faithful account of their work and achievements.

Commitment to the Application Process

• • Preparing a competitive national fellowship application requires a significant investment of time and sustained effort. Throughout the process, students will engage in research, drafting, revision and careful refinement of application materials. Applicants are strongly encouraged to utilize campus resources, including the University Writing Center and the Career Center, to strengthen their materials. In addition to deepening their understanding of the fellowship opportunity, students often gain greater clarity about their academic interests, professional goals and personal motivations.
  • National Fellowship Candidates often come with strengths in a particular group of areas.
    • Academics
    • Service
    • Leadership
    • Research
    • Foreign Language

Value of the Application Process

• • Because selection for a national fellowship is highly competitive and not guaranteed, students are encouraged to value the intellectual and professional growth that occurs throughout the application process. Preparing an application cultivates a range of transferable skills that extend well beyond a single competition. Through the process, students strengthen the following competencies:
    • Writing and Communication Skills
      • ​Crafting compelling personal statements and research proposals
      • Writing with clarity, precision and persuasive purpose
      • Tailoring messages to varied academic and professional audiences
      • Articulating academic interests and career goals effectively
    • Research and Analytical Skills
      • ​Conducting comprehensive research on fellowship opportunities
      • Developing well-reasoned arguments and project justifications
      • Synthesizing complex ideas in clear and accessible language
    • ​Critical Thinking and Self-Reflection
      • ​Assessing personal strengths, areas for growth and long-term aspirations
      • Demonstrating intellectual curiosity and originality
      • Connecting prior experiences to future goals in meaningful ways
    • ​Leadership and Initiative
      • ​Presenting leadership experiences through thoughtful narratives
      • Demonstrating initiative in academic, extracurricular and community contexts
      • Advocating for one’s ideas with professionalism and confidence
    • ​Time Management and Organization
      • ​Balancing application preparation with academic and personal responsibilities
      • Managing multiple deadlines for essays, recommendations and interviews
      • Strategically aligning coursework and experiences with selection criteria
    • ​Interview and Presentation Skills
      • ​Responding thoughtfully and concisely in high-stakes interviews
      • Engaging confidently and authentically with interviewers
      • Adapting responses to dynamic and challenging questions
    • Networking and Professional Development
      • Seeking mentorship and constructive feedback from faculty and advisors
      • Building relationships with recommenders and collaborators
      • Presenting oneself professionally in formal and informal settings
    • ​Resilience and Adaptability
      • ​Incorporating constructive criticism into revisions
      • Learning from setbacks and persisting when appropriate
      • Navigating uncertainty in competitive selection processes

Expand All

for applicants Advice for Students

What to Consider Before Choosing Recommenders

Who is most familiar with my work?
The best letters of recommendation come from the people who can provide specific anecdotes about your experience and skills. Think about who has had repeated, meaningful interactions with you and your coursework, research, or performance in extracurricular activities.

How much time should I give my letter of recommender to write their letter?
When it comes to writing letters of recommendation, the more time you give your recommendation writer the better. Ideally, you should request a letter of recommendation 6-8 weeks before the actual deadline. You should make sure to send a reminder to your letter of recommendation writer one week before the deadline of the National Fellowship. Make sure to thank your recommender and keep them abreast with the results of the competition.

Should I ask my TA (teaching assistant)?
Ideally, you should ask a full professor instead of a TA for a letter of recommendation related to classroom performance or research. If, in the course of your research, you worked more directly with a graduate student than with a professor, the graduate student may be able to provide more specific examples of your knowledge and skills. In this case, it is worthwhile to have your professor and graduate student co-author a letter to which they both contribute their observations of your work and skills. If both parties are willing, the professor should be the one who signs the letter of recommendation.

Who can write about the breadth of my involvement and experiences?
Advisors for student organizations, employers, research supervisors, or directors of volunteer programs are all options for letters for most National Fellowships. Check if the fellowship that interests you has guidelines about who can provide the recommendations.

Who should I NOT ask?
Friends and family members are not appropriate choices for letters of recommendation. Public figures (elected officials, celebrities, etc.) are only appropriate recommenders if they have directly worked with you and can provide anecdotes about your academic performance or work experience with them.

What to Discuss when Requesting a Recommendation
· Your educational and/or career goals
· Which fellowship you are pursuing and why
· The projects, research, or study you will undertake during the fellowship
· The deadline for submitting the recommendation
· The topics you would like covered in the letter*

*Some National Fellowships require that recommenders address specific aspects of your skillset. Make sure your recommender knows the “prompt”!

If you provide your recommenders with drafts of your essays, request that they not refer to specific information in your essays because the essay content may change before final submission.

For faculty & mentors Advice for Nominators

Once Upon a Time: Share engaging anecdotes about your interactions with the student. Providing concrete examples of the student’s achievement and potential is much more valuable than summary statements about the student’s performance in your class/lab/organization.

Starring…the student! Focus on the student’s actions, and avoid dedicating more words to describing your class or program than to describing the student.

The Spirit of Aggieland: Explain A&M-specific terms (like Muster, Freshman Leadership Organization, or Big Event) so that readers unfamiliar with our university’s organizations and traditions can understand them. Avoid referring to “Aggie values” or “Aggie spirit” without explaining what specific characteristics (loyalty, enthusiasm, service, etc.) are entailed, and never start a letter of recommendation with "Howdy!".  

The Bare Minimum: Stating that a student never missed class or submitted all assignments on time does not help the student stand out among other high-achieving candidates. This level of effort is the bare minimum expected by nationally competitive fellowships.

Spelling Bee: Spell out all acronyms upon first reference. The acronym can be included in parentheses and used subsequently.

Juggling Jargon: Explain scientific and field-specific terms, processes, and equipment in layman’s terms. Can an educated reader from a different academic field understand what your student did?

I’m so excited, and I just can’t hide it! Express enthusiasm for the student’s candidacy for a fellowship.